he Light Between the Oceans is an impressive, emotional novel by first-time author M. L. Stedman. The plot hinges on the bond between parents
and their children. In this book, the parents (Tom and Isabel) are a couple who maintain a lighthouse that stands 100 miles off of the west coast of Australia. The child is Lucy - but the twist
is that Lucy is not actually their daughter. One day, a rowboat was washed ashore on tiny Janus Island (where the lighthouse stands) carrying a dead man and a live, crying baby. Isabel just recently
had her third miscarriage and was distraught with grief. The sudden appearance of the healthy baby girl seems like a miracle to Isabel; she sees that God is gifting her a child to make up for her
failed pregnancies. Tom has strong reservations but reluctantly goes along with Isabel's instance that they keep Lucy and pretend that she is their own.
Stedman tries really hard to make Isabel sympathetic. Isabel is young, vivacious, bold and beautiful. Except for the miscarriages, Isabel has thrived out
on the isolated rock that is Janus; Isabel is the ideal wife of a lighthouse keeper. Plus, she just had a third traumatic miscarriage, so surely her decision to keep Lucy is understandable? No? No,
not for me. I never agreed with Isabel. Tom should have immediately radioed the mainland, announce their discovery - and offering to adopt the child if it was an orphan. But Isabel emotionally
blackmails Tom into raising Lucy; rationalizing that if Lucy did have a living mother, that woman would certainly have assumed that her baby had perished.
The middle of book describes the happy years of the infant Lucy growing into a toddler under the loving care of Isabel and Tom. They only visit the mainland
every other year. Isabel's parents are delighted to be doting grandparents and are so proud of how Isabel has blossomed as a young mother. But visiting the mainland pricks Tom's conscience; he
discovers that Lucy's real mother is still alive and still grieving over her lost husband and baby.
The final third of the novel is about consequences. Grief, anger, betrayal and shattered trust - it is a time of supreme unhappiness for all the characters in the book.
I am not a parent, so perhaps that is why I cannot sympathize with Isabel. I liked the character Tom, but Tom should have simply reported the dead body and living baby found in that rowboat. But of course,
then there wouldn't have been this novel.
This bothered me when I read it: on page 253, Stedman writes : "Instead, he [Tom] sought comfort in perspective: in his mind's eye, he mapped out on the ceiling the exact position
the stars would be in that night, starting with Sirius, always the brightest; the Southern Cross, then the planets - Venus and Uranus - all easily visible in the sky over the island." Uranus
is not visible from Earth, except under the most optimal dark sky viewing conditions when it can be perceived as a tiny dot of magnitude of just 6.0 (at the absolute limit of human perception). Change
Uranus to Saturn or Jupiter and the sentence is plausible.
*** Warning - Spoilers below ***
Near the end of the book, everyone is angry and upset with all of the other characters (and rightly so, considering how Isabel's decision has wrecked so many lives).
But then, suddenly, everyone decides to forgive everyone else. It certainly was an unexpected turn of events; it allowed Stedman to write a happy ending. A happy ending is nice, but I found
the frenzy of forgiveness implausible.
I thought it was an amazing (and unnecessary) coincidence that Hannah turned out to be the young woman that Tom had rescued from the drunken soldier on the ship sailing
back to Australia years ago.
Isabel grew up in small town Partaguese, how could she not recognize that the dead man in the boat was Frank? Thus, she would have know that Lucy was Hannah's daughter.
At least twice, Hannah's father, the wealthy Septimus Potts, vows that he will make Tom Sherbourne pay for his wretched behavior. But Mr. Potts never does anything,
Stedman is providing false foreshadowing in order to make Tom's dire circumstances seem even worse. Similar with the mention of the deadly snake when Lucy wanders off one night - the snake and
Lucy never encounter each other, Stedman again is faking out her readers.